#9704: refactor "trace" -- make trace command call trace method on input if
available
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: jason
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-pending
Component: misc | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: William Stein, | Reviewers: Robert Miller, Volker
Jason Grout, Kwankyu Lee | Braun
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: u/klee/9704 | Commit:
Dependencies: #13109 | 133b3282fd7cff37ffe159166232d8bd1bd666be
| Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by klee):
As not everyone is happy with refactoring `trace()` for dual purposes, we
may add `tr()` for mathematical trace instead of `trace()`. Actually I
guess that it is more frequent and convenient to think of `tr(m)` than
`trace(m)` for a non-programmer mathematician. Also it nicely balances
with `det(m)`
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/9704#comment:22>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
