#20511: Not all empty schemes are created equal
--------------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: kedlaya | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.2
Component: algebraic geometry | Resolution:
Keywords: schemes, empty | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
--------------------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by nbruin):
Projective scheme comparison should compare ideals saturated with respect
to the irrelevant ideal:
{{{
sage: U=P2.subscheme([x,y,z])
sage: V=P2.subscheme([x,y^2,z])
sage: J=U.defining_ideal()
sage: U.defining_ideal().saturation(J)[0] ==
V.defining_ideal().saturation(J)[0]
True
}}}
Similarly, the `is_empty` should do:
{{{
sage: one_ideal= J^0 #just get the ideal generated by 1
sage: U.defining_ideal().saturation(J)[0] == one_ideal
}}}
decomposing in irreducible components is a more expensive operation.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20511#comment:1>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
