#20500: LPAbstractDictionary: Refactor leaving_coefficients,
entering_coefficients
using new methods row_coefficients, column_coefficients
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: mkoeppe | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.2
Component: numerical | Resolution:
Keywords: lp | Merged in:
Authors: Peijun Xiao, | Reviewers: Andrey Novoseltsev
Matthias Koeppe | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | a382ec183561102e10c979a0f47d90b3f7625d59
u/mkoeppe/lpabstractdictionary__refactor_leaving_coefficients__entering_coefficients_using_new_methods_row_coefficients__column_coefficients|
Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by mkoeppe):
Replying to [comment:5 novoselt]:
> I am not convinced there is much point in abstract methods, which leads
to duplication of examples and tests,
I think it's quite nice in combination with
`_test_not_implemented_methods` and as a documentation of the interface.
> but in any way:
>
> - `leaving_coefficients` has wrong documentation
> - `column_coefficients` has wrong documentation twice
Fixed.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20500#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
