#20489: A and B bases for Iwahori-Hecke algebras
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  andrew.mathas      |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  positive_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-7.2
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  Iwahori-Hecke      |    Merged in:
  algebra                            |    Reviewers:  Travis Scrimshaw
        Authors:  Andrew Mathas      |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  a5a19ea87b3adada9a18002108fa5b4ca58beae9
  public/algebras/iwahori_A_B_bases-20489|     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by tscrim):

 * status:  needs_review => positive_review


Comment:

 Replying to [comment:18 andrew.mathas]:
 > Replying to [comment:16 tscrim]:
 > > I've gone through and made some fixes for the documentation and a few
 other tweaks. There is one very minor issue with `goldman_involution`
 being defined in the category is that its documentation is hidden.
 However, this is more of a technical issue as at some point we should move
 the category from being a (hidden) nested class to a separate class so it
 is included in the documentation. Yet that can be for a separate ticket.
 >
 > Yes, I agree that these methods should be visible. It would also be good
 if we could have the T-basis and the Kazhdan-Lusztig bases appearing in
 the manual before the A and B bases but it is not clear to me if this is
 possible. Having the least important bases first is certainly not ideal.

 Alas, the latter part is not possible because the doc orders things
 alphabetically.

 > > If you agree with my changes, then you can set a positive review.
 >
 > Yes, thank, you, I am happy with your changes.

 Then I'm setting this to a positive review. Thank you for the addition.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20489#comment:19>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to