#20445: Iteration through finite Coxeter groups
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
stumpc5 | Status: new
Type: | Milestone: sage-7.2
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers:
combinatorics | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | abfff5ffdf5e3d7a90bdaa542ecca3ba2691bffe
Report Upstream: N/A | Stopgaps:
Branch: |
u/stumpc5/20445 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by stumpc5):
Replying to [comment:27 tscrim]:
> Replying to [comment:25 stumpc5]:
> I'm really starting to consider that what we should do is create our own
separate project where we write all of this independently (in, say,
C/C++). At this stage, I'm somewhat concerned with the additional overhead
that Cython could impose and the lack of complete memory control. Although
I cannot commit serious time to working on this for then next two weeks (I
will be in grading and math mode). Over the summer starting in June, I
should be able to do so.
Let me quickly ask: by "create our own separate project where we write all
of this independently (in, say, C/C++)" you mean implementing this
permutation group element there and then use it from our sage
implementation, right?
I'd be happy to follow and help with than whenever you find the time, but
at first I will likely only be watching you doing it...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20445#comment:28>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
