#20564: KleshchevPartitions
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: andrew.mathas | Owner: andrew.mathas
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.2
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: Kleshchev | Merged in:
partition tuples | Reviewers:
Authors: Andrew Mathas | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 1a15906ffaac3f7fa11c7261cae8e14d3e4ec01d
u/andrew.mathas/kleshchevpartitions| Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by andrew.mathas):
Replying to [comment:10 tscrim]:
> Also, I don't understand the comment in the
`KleshchevPartitions_size.__init__`. I think the case for `e=0` is handled
by `IntegerModRing` correctly:
> {{{
> sage: IntegerModRing(0)
> Integer Ring
> }}}
> and the multicharge would be correct. Or am I missing something
elsewhere?
No I think that this was an old comment and that became redundant as
initially I was lists to keep track of residues and then I changed to
using a dictionary. I have deleted it.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20564#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
