#7262: Have multiplcation_by_m() return an EllipticCurveIsogeny object
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  wuthrich         |       Owner:  davidloeffler            
       Type:  defect           |      Status:  new                      
   Priority:  minor            |   Milestone:  sage-4.2                 
  Component:  elliptic curves  |    Keywords:  elliptic curves, isogeny,
Work_issues:                   |      Author:                           
   Reviewer:                   |      Merged:                           
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------

Comment(by wuthrich):

 moving an email discussion forward, John said :

 > So, do we want to allow any (separable) isogeny to be created from the
 > full x-coordinate rational map (or from its numerator and
 > denominator)?  That soulds like a good idea _provided_ that (1) we can
 > do it, more cheaply that discarding the numerator and calling existing
 > code, and also perhaps (2) we have a way of checking the validity.

 I would send both coordinates to the constructor. Your code of
 constructing them is faster than what the generic isogeny-code will do.

 > As a first step, suppose we only allow this when the codomain is also
 > specified (as we can do in this case).  Then checking validity is
 > quite easy (you get the y-coordinate by differentiating and scaling
 > appropriately and then plug into the equation of the codomain -- I can
 > write this out properly if you do not follow me.)

 Yes, that is what I will do. I do not think that we will need this option
 of specifying an isogeny when the codomain is not known. One could always
 send the denominator as a kernel_polynomial which will create the
 codomain.

 Of course there is an obvious extension that should be added here. Complex
 multiplication, like multiplication_by_n(2*i+3). Also we could make
 automorphisms into a group and create a endomorphism ring... oh but I am
 dreaming some steps ahead of what I will do about this ticket.

 Chris.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7262#comment:1>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to