#7051: [with patch, positive review] latex issues
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: jhpalmieri | Owner: jhpalmieri
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-4.2
Component: misc | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: | Work_issues:
Author: John H. Palmieri | Reviewer: Tim Dumol
Merged: sage-4.2.alpha0 |
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Comment(by jhpalmieri):
You know, the right choice might be to remove 'CDF' from the list of
macros. After all, the whole point of the list is to be able to use `\RR`
in a docstring and have it look nice. Using `\CDF` in a docstring won't
look very good with '\\texttt{Complex Double Field}' or any variant on it.
The only place I see '\CDF' in the Sage library is in sage.misc.latex,
where it comes from sage_jsmath_macros. (I did
{{{search_src('\\\\CDF')}}}.) So I think we should delete it: it was a
mistake of mine to include it in the first place.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7051#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
