#20680: Some optimizations for addition in combinatorial free modules and dict_*
methods
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: tscrim | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.3
Component: performance | Resolution:
Keywords: combinatorial | Merged in:
free module, addition | Reviewers: Nicolas M. Thiéry
Authors: Travis Scrimshaw | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | f0821047288ebd5d964a9888c7872b962e9fef37
public/combinat/improve_dict_addition-20680| Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by tscrim):
* status: needs_work => needs_info
Comment:
So what the issue is is that the example finite monoid does not have an
ordering of its elements. What I am thinking of doing is implementing a
`_cmp_` by using the `_cmp_by_value` of `ElementWrapper`. This will make
this doctest far less fragile in the future (it's somewhat surprising it
is not machine dependent as is), but it then becomes less of a minimal
implementation.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20680#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
