#20681: Cythonize the special methods in the categories that handle coercion in
arithmetic
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.3
Component: categories | Resolution:
Keywords: performance | Merged in:
Authors: Nicolas M. Thiéry | Reviewers: Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/categories/cythonize_arithmetic_special_methods-20681|
de62437f434f282dd41256ff9529d4aca3d679fd
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:16 jdemeyer]:
> In other words: you write
> {{{
> # This could eventually be moved to SageObject
> }}}
> I think you should just do that instead (but for `Element` instead of
`SageObject`).
(for the record: I just moved that comment which was already there).
Yes, I pondered about that, since we had this parallel discussion
about moving all the coercion methods up to Element. If we do the
move, we should do it for all coercion methods at once. However, given
that this moving is a non trivial API change and still under
discussion, I prefer to postpone it to a later ticket.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20681#comment:18>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
