#20743: Parent.list() should return an immutable tuple
-------------------------------------+------------------------
       Reporter:  jsrn               |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  new
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-7.3
      Component:  categories         |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  parent, immutable  |    Merged in:
        Authors:                     |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+------------------------

Comment (by kedlaya):

 Replying to [comment:12 nbruin]:
 > Replying to [comment:10 kedlaya]:
 >
 > > But it might be unavoidable: tuples must consist of immutable objects,
 so it may not always be possible to return one.
 >
 > That is not true:
 > {{{
 > sage: A=([1],[2])
 > sage: A[0].append(3)
 > sage: A
 > ([1, 3], [2])
 > }}}
 >
 Yes, you're right. The only time it matters whether a member of a tuple is
 mutable is when the tuple is hashed.

 So that means that one could cache a tuple and have `foo.list()` return a
 list copy of that tuple, as long as there is no actual legitimate reason
 to modify the cached list (I certainly can't think of one). In a
 performance-critical situation, one shouldn't be asking for either a list
 or a tuple anyway, but rather an iterator.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20743#comment:14>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to