#20705: Classes for Reed Muller Codes
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: panda314 | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.3
Component: coding theory | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/panda314/classes_for_reed_muller_codes|
5129c915c146098f2c9c03ce89ca992b32e86609
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by dlucas):
> So should we keep BinaryReedMullerCode? in codes_catalog.py in keeping
with the BinaryReedMullerCode?() function from guava.py? Or should i just
keep the guava.py implementation with a warning regarding it's
depreciation?
Oh, good point! Let's just keep `BinaryReedMullerCode` in `codes_catalog`
for now, and we'll deal with it afterwards.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20705#comment:18>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
