#20888: Support GinacFunction._print_latex_() customization
-------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: rws | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.3
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------+------------------------
Description changed by rws:
Old description:
> Defining a LaTeX print function (instead of just a latex name) is only
> possible for `GinacFunction`s by changing Pynac.
>
> I think it would be more consistent to simply allow the same mechanism as
> with `BuiltinFunction`s. This should pose no problem, since there it is
> already channeled through Pynac. Effectively, if there is not a LaTeX
> print function defined in Pynac then the Python `_print_latex_` member
> should be tried.
New description:
Defining a LaTeX print function (instead of just a latex name) is only
possible for `GinacFunction`s by changing Pynac.
I think it would be more consistent to simply allow the same mechanism as
with `BuiltinFunction`s. This should pose no problem, since there it is
already channeled through Pynac. Effectively, if there is not a LaTeX
print function defined in Pynac then the Python `_print_latex_` member
should be tried.
See also #11428
--
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20888#comment:1>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.