#20940: LatticePoset: add is_sectionally_complemented()
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  jmantysalo         |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-7.3
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Jori Mäntysalo     |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/jmantysalo/sectionally_complemented|  
b198ceee80bc66133224027a0ca75a1251d684ea
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by jmantysalo):

 Replying to [comment:24 kdilks]:
 > Do you mean having the default {{{certificate=False}}} case first? I'll
 settle for just that being changed.

 Now they are in different order in this and `is_relatively_complemented`.
 But OK for me...

 Some day after poset documentation polishing I'll run the same for
 lattices.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20940#comment:26>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to