#20469: Implement Ariki-Koike algebras
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  tscrim             |        Owner:  sage-combinat
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  new
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-7.3
      Component:  algebra            |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  hecke algebra,     |    Merged in:
  complex reflection group, ariki-   |
  koike                              |
        Authors:  Travis Scrimshaw,  |    Reviewers:  Andrew Mathas, Travis
  Andrew Mathas                      |  Scrimshaw
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  public/algebras/ariki_koike_algebras-20469|  
e9b6a594ae1e089b51b37081f35743402447a960
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by andrew.mathas):

 Replying to [comment:10 tscrim]:
 > Replying to [comment:8 andrew.mathas]:

 > I'm +1 for getting things closer to the KLR algebra (something that I
 hope to eventually get into Sage at some point). Otherwise I don't have an
 opinion on which presentation we use. How much would have to be changed in
 order to move to the Hu-Mathas presentation?

 With all of these things it is mainly a matter of implementing appropriate
 analogues of the three methods `_product_LTwTv`, `_product_Tw_L`, and
 `_Li_power` that underpin the multiplication. Replacing `q` with a two
 variable version may be the hardest option as we'd have to think what the
 appropriate normalisation of the Jucys-Murphy elements is. This said, I
 would prefer to have the more symmetric relations `(T_i-q)(T_i+q^{-1})=0`,
 so I will have a think about this.

 Regarding KLR algebras, implementing the "affine" KLR algebras is
 reasonably straightforward. I know now of a way to do the cyclotomic
 quotients in a few cases and I will implement them at some point, although
 the isomorphism to the ungraded algebras is much harder to do.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20469#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to