#21014: make: docbuilding should depend on jmol
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jhpalmieri | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-7.3
Component: build | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: John Palmieri | Reviewers: Jeroen Demeyer
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: u/jhpalmieri/doc- | Commit:
build-depends-on-jmol | d741fbb99328eb03aea7c78db8d8370700ee705c
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by dimpase):
Replying to [comment:6 jdemeyer]:
> Replying to [comment:4 vbraun]:
> > If we make plots then we run arbitrary Sage code. So all runtime
dependencies are docbuild dependencies, no? And if not then somebody just
hasn't make a sufficiently complicated plot yet. What I'm proposing thus
is to just use a dependency like
> > {{{
> > doc-html: all-build
> > }}}
>
> This used to be the case a while ago, but it makes the parallel build
less efficient. For example, currently R can be built in parallel with the
docs.
but this is only true as long as there is no doctest using R somewhere you
do not expect it to be used.
With your proposal, parallel builds would take more time. I'm not saying
that this is a huge problem, just pointing it out.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21014#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
