#20564: KleshchevPartitions
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: andrew.mathas | Owner: andrew.mathas
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.3
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: Kleshchev | Merged in:
partition tuples |
Authors: Andrew Mathas | Reviewers: Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/combinat/kleshchev_partitoins-20564|
deeae1f2545ac91b3b9148ca612fe93f05f1eab0
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by tscrim):
I've added a basic implementation of `\ell`-restricted partitions. I've
also gone through and fixed a number of other issues with the additional
methods (e.g., `good_residue_sequence`). I just wanted to make sure
everything looked good to you before I fixed the failing doctests. Also,
do you have a good example for the Mullineux conjugate?
Additionally, I discovered that my implementation of Kleshchev partitions
had the partitions ordered in reverse order (but not the rows), reflecting
my usual preference to use the opposite convention of Kashiwara for tensor
products. To add this, all we would need to do is basically add another
input option for Kleshchev partitions, but what would we call this option?
`(tensor_)convention`? Refine the `direction` to be of the form `UR`,
`UL`, `DR`, `DL`?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20564#comment:22>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
