#20921: LatticePoset: add function to get lattice of sublattices
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jmantysalo | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.3
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: lattice poset | Merged in:
Authors: Jori Mäntysalo | Reviewers: Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jmantysalo/latticeposet__add_function_to_get_lattice_of_sublattices|
cf557bbcdbe1e6d8a306d586a6cd3820c145344c
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jmantysalo):
Replying to [comment:14 tscrim]:
> Formally (i.e., if a English professor looked at it), I'm not sure if
the "the" is necessary here because it is plural and the structure of the
sentence is declarative. Feel free to add it as it is not wrong.
If it is not needed, I can left it off. I was just wondering when you
wrote "tuple - elements are" vs. "integer - the elements".
Ready now?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20921#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
