#19877: Add SageNB exporter, Jupyter extension
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vbraun | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.0
Component: packages: | Resolution:
standard |
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Volker Braun | Reviewers: Nicolas Thiéry, Eric
| Gourgoulhon, Benjamin Ragan-Kelley,
| Karl-Dieter Crisman
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/vbraun/add_sagenb_exporter__jupyter_extension|
a89993a9228ed4960dc1f972b3b195f438bf998a
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
> Jupyter notebooks are a single file and not an opaque directory full of
stuff. This is a fundamental design choice and not going to change. About
the only thing we can do is prevent people from writing new SageNB
notebooks so their data doesn't end up in an evolutionary dead end.
So in a Jupyter notebook one would include other data in a more 'Pythonic'
way? We'd want fairly good documentation on how to do that (as well as
the below).
>
> Jupyter interacts have a slightly different syntax
> {{{
> from ipywidgets import interact, IntSlider
> @interact
> def _(n=IntSlider(3)):
> print n^2
> }}}
> One might write a compatibility layer so that the old SageNB interact
syntax still works, thats not something that belongs on this ticket.
I see. That's too bad that it's not in the global namespace for Sage
Jupyter worksheets, perhaps could be addressed there. Making interacts
more difficult to do is a regression (completely irrespective of the whole
default or exporting question). As a different question, would Jupyter
notebooks be able to support the "extended" syntax that SMC and Sage cell
support (e.g. nested interacts)?
> Accordingly, I would suggest to set the ticket to positive review. Do
you agree?
I think I'm okay with that as long as it's not (yet) the default notebook
for continuing users. We need a solution of some kind for the above two
issues before that. Please cc: me on any such tickets - once created I
think we can set this to positive review, yes.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19877#comment:54>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
