#21114: ATLAS spkg doesn't need /Sage's/ python to build
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
       Reporter:  leif                           |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement                    |       Status:  new
       Priority:  minor                          |    Milestone:  sage-7.3
      Component:  packages: standard             |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  sage-spkg dependencies spkg-   |    Merged in:
  install                                        |
        Authors:                                 |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                            |  Work issues:
         Branch:                                 |       Commit:
   Dependencies:                                 |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Description changed by leif:

Old description:

> Since we meanwhile require a ''system'' python to let Sage build anyway,
> we don't have to wait with building ATLAS until Sage's python has been
> built, as ATLAS doesn't install any Python libraries, but only its `spkg-
> install` has been rewritten in Python quite a while ago.
>
> This requires two things:
>
>  * Remove the dependency of ATLAS on `$(PYTHON)` (which means Sage's
> `python2` or `python3` package) in its `dependencies`.
>
>  * Make ATLAS' `spkg-install` again a shell script, renaming the current
> one to `spkg-install.py`, say, where the shell script just contains
> {{{
> #!sh
> #!/bin/sh
> exec python spkg-install.py
> }}}
>    This is necessary because `sage-spkg` checks whether ''Sage's''
> `python` is already installed if an `spkg-install` script starts with `#!
> ... python`, and bails out otherwise:
> {{{
> atlas-3.10.2.p2
> ====================================================
> Setting up build directory for atlas-3.10.2.p2
> Finished set up
> Error: The spkg-install script is written in Python, but the Python
> package is not yet installed in Sage.  You should add $(PYTHON)
> as dependency in build/pkgs/atlas/dependencies
> make[2]: *** [.../sage/local/var/lib/sage/installed/atlas-3.10.2.p2]
> Error 1
> }}}
>   (Note that this message originates from a build where the `Makefile`
> was broken, such that the `make` dependency of ATLAS on the python
> package was fulfilled by `$(PYTHON)` accidentally being empty.  So one
> won't get this message unless the `Makefile` is corrupted.)
>
> ----
>
> Rather orthogonal to that, our top-level `configure` doesn't contain any
> check for `python` yet, although currently at least `sage-download-file`
> and `sage-uncompress-spkg` require (a system) python (in the beginning of
> the build).  I'll address that on another ticket.

New description:

 Since we meanwhile require a ''system'' python to let Sage build anyway,
 we don't have to wait with building ATLAS until Sage's python has been
 built, as ATLAS doesn't install any Python libraries, but only its `spkg-
 install` has been rewritten in Python quite a while ago.

 This requires two things:

  * Remove the dependency of ATLAS on `$(PYTHON)` (which means Sage's
 `python2` or `python3` package) in its `dependencies`.

  * Make ATLAS' `spkg-install` again a shell script, renaming the current
 one to `spkg-install.py`, say, where the shell script just contains
 {{{
 #!sh
 #!/bin/sh
 exec python spkg-install.py
 }}}
    This is necessary because `sage-spkg` checks whether ''Sage's''
 `python` is already installed if an `spkg-install` script starts with `#!
 ... python`, and bails out otherwise:
 {{{
 atlas-3.10.2.p2
 ====================================================
 Setting up build directory for atlas-3.10.2.p2
 Finished set up
 Error: The spkg-install script is written in Python, but the Python
 package is not yet installed in Sage.  You should add $(PYTHON)
 as dependency in build/pkgs/atlas/dependencies
 make[2]: *** [.../sage/local/var/lib/sage/installed/atlas-3.10.2.p2] Error
 1
 }}}
   (Note that this message originates from a build where the `Makefile` was
 broken, such that the `make` dependency of ATLAS on the python package was
 fulfilled by `$(PYTHON)` accidentally being empty.  So one won't get this
 message unless the `Makefile` is corrupted.)

 ----

 Rather orthogonal to that, our top-level `configure` doesn't contain any
 check for `python` yet, although currently at least `sage-download-file`
 and `sage-uncompress-spkg` require (a system) python (in the beginning of
 the build).  I'll address that on another ticket -- see #21116.

--

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21114#comment:1>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to