#6583: Implement two descent over QQ natively in Sage using ratpoints
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  rlm              |       Owner:  rlm          
       Type:  enhancement      |      Status:  needs_review 
   Priority:  major            |   Milestone:  sage-4.2.1   
  Component:  elliptic curves  |    Keywords:               
Work_issues:                   |      Author:  Robert Miller
   Reviewer:                   |      Merged:               
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------

Comment(by wuthrich):

 Ok. I tested the patches and they all go through. Also the -coverage gives
 6 out of 6 despite the fact that many functions in descent_two_isogeny.pyx
 lack a good documentation and especially examples are missing often. I
 guess this is because cdefs are not tested. (I admit I never reviewed a
 cython file.)

 Currently the main function gives back four integers, like mwrank does.
 They are useful to compute an upper bound on the rank of the Mordell-Weil
 group and should (in the future) be called from {{{rank()}}} and also from
 {{{sha()}}}.

 Personnally I would like more, namely I would like to have a phi-Selmer
 group. Ideally we should give back a abelian group associated to the
 elliptic curve, or even better to the isogeny. But isogenies are not there
 yet, though 2-isogenies should be. The Selmer groups would contain more
 information than just these four integers and I believe this extra-
 information is already computed in this algorithm.

 Right now the functions are not callable without an extra import and so
 they do not pollute the name-space and we are still flexible in how to do
 this later; like {{{.selmer_group()}}} etc. That is very good. Yet it does
 not really look like a finished patch.

 It is work in progress (and it is very good work in the right direction),
 but I am incapable of saying whether this sort of work should already be
 included in sage or not. So before giving a positive review to this patch,
 I would like to ask the author's and other's opinion on this. Maybe I
 could also ask for more examples, especially in the header of the file,
 despite the fact that it is not included in the documentation right now.

 Chris.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6583#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to