#7095: os x 10.6 port -- numerous mysterious errors caused by weird "abort trap"
issue
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: tbd
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-4.3
Component: porting | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Author:
Upstream: N/A | Reviewer:
Merged: |
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Comment(by was):
> Given the comment I put on sage-devel about there two quite respectable
parties
> believing gcc 4.3.3 is the most stable gcc, it might be worth trying a
build
> with gcc 4.3.3.
My understanding is that there is no GCC 4.3.3 for OS X. There's only
4.2.x and 4.0.x, as provided by Apple. I don't think Apple has ported
GCC > 4.2 to OS X yet.
> Although it will lengthen the build process a bit, I would be tempted to
enable all > the mpfr tests by default. They have a habbit of finding
compiler bugs. Having known > of several mpfr test failures, my experience
has always been that the test is ok, .
> and mpfr has discovered a bug in other code. In one case it was the
Solaris memset() > call, but on an several cases it is gcc bugs.
I think effort would be better spent making {{{export SPKG_CHECK="yes"}}}
fully work; then we would always do test builds of Sage with that flag
set, and hence run all tests.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7095#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
