#6583: Implement two descent over QQ natively in Sage using ratpoints
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  rlm              |       Owner:  rlm          
       Type:  enhancement      |      Status:  needs_review 
   Priority:  major            |   Milestone:  sage-4.3     
  Component:  elliptic curves  |    Keywords:               
Work_issues:                   |      Author:  Robert Miller
   Upstream:  N/A              |    Reviewer:               
     Merged:                   |  
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------

Comment(by rlm):

 I was just trying to address your question whether there were examples
 where this was better than mwrank. Your second comment, "any enhanced
 performance comes from the use of the more recent version of ratpoints" is
 very false: if I remove the use of ratpoints altogether, the speedup
 factors increase!
 {{{
 sage: L = []
 sage: for E in cremona_optimal_curves(range(200)):
     if E.torsion_order()%2 == 0:
         A = E.mwrank_curve()
         t = walltime()
         A.two_descent(verbose=False, selmer_only=True,
 second_descent=False)
         t = walltime(t)
         s = walltime()
         _ = two_descent_by_two_isogeny(E, selmer_only=True)
         s = walltime(s)
         if s > t: print E.label()
         else:
             L.append(t/s)
 ....:
 sage: sum(L)/len(L)
 147.24136054804828
 }}}

 Thus I argue that this code is definitely worth including, especially
 since this exact code was the main motivation for including ratpoints in
 Sage in the first place. I don't know what "typical" means regarding the
 conductor bound, especially since I'm primarily interested in curves with
 small conductor. I spent a long time optimizing this code, and I'd rather
 not see that work getting lost to the four winds.

 (John-- Maybe I'm just missing your point?)

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6583#comment:15>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.


Reply via email to