#5174: _repr_ for large matrices should indicate how to see the entries
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: jason | Owner: was
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.3
Component: linear algebra | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Author: John Palmieri
Upstream: N/A | Reviewer:
Merged: |
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Comment(by jhpalmieri):
Replying to [comment:4 was]:
> > It would be pretty easy to change the print representation so
> > if there were no name attached to the object (e.g., if it were
> > produced by another method, as in this example), then the extra
> > message about "print ..." would be omitted. Opinions?
>
> How do you do that? I would have no clue.
A web search led me to a code snippet (by Georg Brandl, the author of
Sphinx) which more or less searches through the {{{locals()}}} dictionary
for the object, making a list of the variable names bound to it. (See
the part of the patch for the file sageinspect.py.) If you exclude the
variable names starting with "_", then if the resulting list is empty, you
don't print the message.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5174#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
