#2369: Fix all issues reported by the W3C Validator for Notebook HTML & CSS
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  TimothyClemans  |       Owner:  TimothyClemans
       Type:  task            |      Status:  new           
   Priority:  major           |   Milestone:  sage-4.3.1    
  Component:  notebook        |    Keywords:                
Work_issues:                  |      Author:                
   Upstream:  N/A             |    Reviewer:                
     Merged:                  |  
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Changes (by drkirkby):

 * cc: was, david.kir...@… (added)
  * upstream:  => N/A


Comment:

 This ticket is 22 months old and the notebook has changed in that time,
 but I think it is well worth fixing the W3C validation errors, for reasons
 that are not so obvious.

 When I look at the Wolfram Reserach site

 http://www.wolfram.com/

 and see 259 Errors, 4 warning(s)

 
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wolfram.com&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0
 &user-agent=W3C_Validator%2F1.654


 it gives me the impression of not taking care of details. Wolfram Reserach
 could reasonably argue they would rather devote time to improving
 Mathematica, than fixing the web site. One can see some logic to that. But
 I personally still see this as not paying attention to detail.

 In contrast, the Sage web

 site has few if any issues with the W3C validator. The home page is
 faultless in this respect

 
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sagemath.org%2F&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0

 As such, even if the notebook looks fine, I believe the errors should be
 removed, to give the impression that attention is paid to detail.

 A google search on 'W3C validator' shows 2,230,000 hits. It is obvious
 people do use that tool.

 Dave

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2369#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.


Reply via email to