#7809: region_plot does not respect the passed variable order
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jason | Owner: was
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.3.1
Component: graphics | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Author:
Upstream: N/A | Reviewer:
Merged: |
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Comment(by kcrisman):
Replying to [comment:3 jason]:
> Replying to [comment:2 kcrisman]:
> > Looks like this is the only place equify is used, so I think this does
not require any deprecation for the removed optional argument. There
should be another doctest in to show this works, though, like
> > {{{
> > sage: region_plot([y>.3, x>0, x^2+y^2<1], (x,-1.1, 1.1), (y,-1.1,
1.1), plot_points = 400).show(aspect_ratio=1)
> > sage: region_plot([y>.3, x>0, x^2+y^2<1], (y,-1.1, 1.1), (x,-1.1,
1.1), plot_points = 400).show(aspect_ratio=1)
> > }}}
>
>
> Does this actually produce an incorrect plot before the patch? I'll
check, but I'm pretty sure it should work.
>
I didn't bother to check, but it seems like this was the concern, or? At
any rate there should be something documented that didn't work before and
now does. Otherwise I don't quite get why we are removing the potential
for passing in the variables here.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7809#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
