#8114: doctest failure in `sage/libs/cremona/newforms.pyx` on 32-bit machines 
from
#8042
------------------------------------------+---------------------------------
   Reporter:  craigcitro                  |       Owner:  was            
       Type:  defect                      |      Status:  positive_review
   Priority:  blocker                     |   Milestone:  sage-4.3.2     
  Component:  interfaces                  |    Keywords:                 
     Author:  Craig Citro, William Stein  |    Upstream:  N/A            
   Reviewer:  William Stein, Craig Citro  |      Merged:                 
Work_issues:                              |  
------------------------------------------+---------------------------------
Changes (by newvalueoldvalue):

  * status:  needs_review => positive_review
  * reviewer:  => William Stein, Craig Citro
  * author:  Craig Citro => Craig Citro, William Stein


Comment:

 Sure, that's fine. I was expecting that anyone who wanted to know what was
 going on would look at #8042, where there's an explanation -- but you're
 right, it wouldn't hurt to have at least some explanation in the code
 itself. (Basically, my rule of thumb is that anything in an `EXAMPLES`
 section needs a good explanation, but for things in the `TESTS` section, a
 pointer to a trac ticket is sufficient.)

 Positive review -- apply both patches. (William, I'm listing us both as
 authors and reviewers, since we each reviewed the other person's
 contribution.)

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8114#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to