#6559: Real domain for symbolic variables
----------------------------------------------------+-----------------------
   Reporter:  gmhossain                             |       Owner:            
       Type:  enhancement                           |      Status:  needs_work
   Priority:  major                                 |   Milestone:  sage-4.3.2
  Component:  symbolics                             |    Keywords:  pynac     
     Author:  Golam Mortuza Hossain, Burcin Erocal  |    Upstream:  N/A       
   Reviewer:  Karl-Dieter Crisman                   |      Merged:            
Work_issues:                                        |  
----------------------------------------------------+-----------------------
Changes (by kcrisman):

  * status:  needs_review => needs_work


Comment:

 Followup:

 Adding the referee patch causes a number of segfaults in things relating
 to assumptions.  For example, the calculus/calculus.py doctest where it is
 assumed that abs(q)<1, and the one in calculus/wester.py where it is
 assumed that x>=y, y>=z, z>=x.    It is not consistent whether the
 assumption itself or the thing using the assumption causes the hang.  Is
 it possible that the _is_* methods or the info flags in ginac/decl.pxi are
 responsible?  This is a question out of ignorance; I don't see how they
 would interfere with Maxima or the use of it by (e.g.) symbolic_sum, but
 it's all I can think of.

 Also, the citation.pyx and random_tests.py are repeatable.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6559#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to