#8087: jinja2 fails to build on Open Solaris x64 (looks like 32/64 mix)
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: drkirkby | Owner: drkirkby
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.3.2
Component: solaris | Keywords:
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Comment(by drkirkby):
I do not believe it should be closed until we have a Python in Sage which
is working fully on Open Solaris. We do not currently have that. However,
your deduction of the reason for this is of course very useful.
I just run ''configure --help'' in the python source, and see this. Note
the 3rd option. I wonder if we should be using "--with-universal-
archs=64-bit" on 64-bit builds. That might help out with other 64-bit
issues related to python.
{{{
Optional Packages:
--with-PACKAGE[=ARG] use PACKAGE [ARG=yes]
--without-PACKAGE do not use PACKAGE (same as --with-PACKAGE=no)
--with-universal-archs=ARCH
select architectures for universal build
("32-bit",
"64-bit" or "all")
}}}
Dave
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8087#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
