#5396: Wrapping lcalc library
------------------------------------------+---------------------------------
   Reporter:  rishi                       |       Owner:  Rishi     
       Type:  enhancement                 |      Status:  needs_info
   Priority:  major                       |   Milestone:  sage-4.3.2
  Component:  number theory               |    Keywords:  lcalc     
     Author:  rishi, ylchapuy             |    Upstream:  N/A       
   Reviewer:  John Cremona, David Kirkby  |      Merged:            
Work_issues:                              |  
------------------------------------------+---------------------------------

Comment(by drkirkby):

 As you can tell, this is outside my Mathematical knowledge, but just a few
 comments.

  * If this behaves differently to what someone might expect, then it
 should be documented how it works. I believe John is an expert in this
 area and he was surprised by the behavior, then clearly it could cause
 confusion.
  * Since John's computed an computed a result with high precision, I would
 put that as a comment in the test code.
  * I recall William once saying lcalc was very fast, but to me at least,
 this is not computing a very accurate result. I would suggest that should
 also be documented too. along with slower, but more accurate alternatives.



 Dave

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5396#comment:55>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to