#5396: Wrapping lcalc library
------------------------------------------+---------------------------------
Reporter: rishi | Owner: Rishi
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.3.2
Component: number theory | Keywords: lcalc
Author: rishi, ylchapuy | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: John Cremona, David Kirkby | Merged:
Work_issues: |
------------------------------------------+---------------------------------
Comment(by drkirkby):
As you can tell, this is outside my Mathematical knowledge, but just a few
comments.
* If this behaves differently to what someone might expect, then it
should be documented how it works. I believe John is an expert in this
area and he was surprised by the behavior, then clearly it could cause
confusion.
* Since John's computed an computed a result with high precision, I would
put that as a comment in the test code.
* I recall William once saying lcalc was very fast, but to me at least,
this is not computing a very accurate result. I would suggest that should
also be documented too. along with slower, but more accurate alternatives.
Dave
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5396#comment:55>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.