#8291: eisenstein_series_qexp ridiculously bad  over finite fields
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  AlexGhitza     |       Owner:  craigcitro
       Type:  defect         |      Status:  new       
   Priority:  major          |   Milestone:  sage-4.3.3
  Component:  modular forms  |    Keywords:            
     Author:                 |    Upstream:  N/A       
   Reviewer:                 |      Merged:            
Work_issues:                 |  
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
 I was the one who made Eisenstein series "work" over arbitrary fields.  It
 turns out that I didn't do a very good job, and you don't have to go very
 far to break it:

 {{{
 sage: eisenstein_series_qexp(26, 10, GF(13))
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 OverflowError                             Traceback (most recent call
 last)

 /opt/sage-4.3.2/devel/sage-main/sage/modular/modform/<ipython console> in
 <module>()

 /home/ghitza/sage-devel/local/lib/python2.6/site-
 packages/sage/modular/modform/eis_series.pyc in eisenstein_series_qexp(k,
 prec, K, var, integral)
     105     val[0] = a0
     106     R = K[[var]]
 --> 107     return R(val, prec=prec, check=False)
     108
     109
 ######################################################################

 /home/ghitza/sage-devel/local/lib/python2.6/site-
 packages/sage/rings/power_series_ring.pyc in __call__(self, f, prec,
 check)
     408             v = sage_eval(f.Eltseq())
     409             return self(v) * (self.gen(0)**f.Valuation())
 --> 410         return self.__power_series_class(self, f, prec,
 check=check)
     411
     412     def construction(self):

 /home/ghitza/sage-devel/local/lib/python2.6/site-
 packages/sage/rings/power_series_poly.so in
 sage.rings.power_series_poly.PowerSeries_poly.__init__
 (sage/rings/power_series_poly.c:2373)()

 /home/ghitza/sage-devel/local/lib/python2.6/site-
 packages/sage/structure/parent.so in sage.structure.parent.Parent.__call__
 (sage/structure/parent.c:6228)()

 /home/ghitza/sage-devel/local/lib/python2.6/site-
 packages/sage/structure/coerce_maps.so in
 sage.structure.coerce_maps.DefaultConvertMap_unique._call_with_args
 (sage/structure/coerce_maps.c:3532)()

 /home/ghitza/sage-devel/local/lib/python2.6/site-
 packages/sage/structure/coerce_maps.so in
 sage.structure.coerce_maps.DefaultConvertMap_unique._call_with_args
 (sage/structure/coerce_maps.c:3353)()

 /home/ghitza/sage-devel/local/lib/python2.6/site-
 packages/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_ring.pyc in
 _element_constructor_(self, x, check, is_gen, construct, **kwds)
     310                 x = x.Polrev()
     311
 --> 312         return C(self, x, check, is_gen, construct=construct,
 **kwds)
     313
     314     def is_integral_domain(self, proof = True):

 /home/ghitza/sage-devel/local/lib/python2.6/site-
 packages/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_zmod_flint.so in
 sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_zmod_flint.Polynomial_zmod_flint.__init__
 (sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_zmod_flint.c:10916)()

 /home/ghitza/sage-devel/local/lib/python2.6/site-
 packages/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_zmod_flint.so in
 sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_zmod_flint.Polynomial_zmod_flint._set_list
 (sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_zmod_flint.c:11368)()

 OverflowError: long int too large to convert
 }}}

 A side note: the workaround at the end of the method is not necessary any
 more, and can be removed.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8291>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to