#8401: doctest devel/sage/sage/graphs/graph_database.py fails on Solaris 10
(SPARC)
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  drkirkby  |       Owner:  tbd       
       Type:  defect    |      Status:  new       
   Priority:  major     |   Milestone:  sage-4.3.4
  Component:  doctest   |    Keywords:            
     Author:            |    Upstream:  N/A       
   Reviewer:            |      Merged:            
Work_issues:            |  
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Description changed by drkirkby:

Old description:

> == Details of the computer ==
>  * Sun Blade 1000
>  * 2 x 900 MHz UltraSPARC III+ CPUs
>  * 2 GB RAM
>  * Solaris 10 03/2005 (first release of Solaris 10)
>  * gcc 4.4.3
>
>  == Sage version 4.3.3 (with several patches) ==
> I'm using a patched version of Sage sage-4.3.3, build as a 32-bit binary.
> The patches include:
>
>  * #7867 Python patch, to allow Sage library to build.
>  * #8191 Addition of iconv, which is needed for R
>  * #8285 Update R's spkg-install to work on Solaris
>  * #8363 Remove a useless check for mpir in cddlib
>  * #8375 Numerical noise in devel/sage/sage/symbolic/pynac.pyx
>  * #8374 Numerical noise in devel/sage/sage/symbolic/constants_c.pyx
>  * #8371 Patch to allow pyprocessing to build - it failed after python
> was patched as #7867. (Note #6503 aims to remove pyprocessing
> completely).
>
>  == The problem ==
> There are 8 test failures on this rather old SPARC. Increasing
> SAGE_TIMEOUT allowed 3 to pass. The longest is
> "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/symmetric_ideal.py" which takes 459.4
> s.
>
> However, 5 failures remain outstanding.
>
> {{{
>     sage -t  "devel/sage/sage/graphs/graph_list.py" # Segfault
>     sage -t  "devel/sage/sage/graphs/generic_graph.py" # Segfault
>     sage -t  "devel/sage/sage/graphs/graph.py" # Segfault
>     sage -t  "devel/sage/sage/graphs/graph_database.py" # Segfault
>     sage -t  "devel/sage/sage/databases/database.py" # Segfault
> }}}
>
> == Specific failure of this ticket ==
>
> This ticket is documenting graph_database.py, or to be more precise
>
> {{{
> "devel/sage/sage/graphs/graph_database.py"
> }}}
>

> == Related tickets ==
> The other failures observed on this build of Solaris 10 are #8397, #8398,
> #8399 and #8400

New description:

 == Details of the computer ==
  * Sun Blade 1000
  * 2 x 900 MHz UltraSPARC III+ CPUs
  * 2 GB RAM
  * Solaris 10 03/2005 (first release of Solaris 10)
  * gcc 4.4.3 (uses Sun linker and assembler)

  == Sage version 4.3.3 (with several patches) ==
 I'm using a patched version of Sage 4.3.3, build as a 32-bit binary. The
 patches include:

  * #7867 Python patch, to allow Sage library to build.
  * #8191 Addition of iconv, which is needed for R
  * #8285 Update R's spkg-install to work on Solaris
  * #8363 Remove a useless check for mpir in cddlib
  * #8375 Numerical noise in devel/sage/sage/symbolic/pynac.pyx
  * #8374 Numerical noise in devel/sage/sage/symbolic/constants_c.pyx
  * #8371 Patch to allow pyprocessing to build - it failed after python was
 patched as #7867. (Note #6503 aims to remove pyprocessing completely).

  == The problem ==
 There are 8 test failures on this rather old SPARC. Increasing
 SAGE_TIMEOUT allowed 3 to pass. The longest is
 "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/symmetric_ideal.py" which takes 459.4 s.

 However, 5 failures remain outstanding.

 {{{
     sage -t  "devel/sage/sage/graphs/graph_list.py" # Segfault
     sage -t  "devel/sage/sage/graphs/generic_graph.py" # Segfault
     sage -t  "devel/sage/sage/graphs/graph.py" # Segfault
     sage -t  "devel/sage/sage/graphs/graph_database.py" # Segfault
     sage -t  "devel/sage/sage/databases/database.py" # Segfault
 }}}

 == Specific failure of this ticket ==

 This ticket is documenting graph_database.py, or to be more precise

 {{{
 "devel/sage/sage/graphs/graph_database.py"
 }}}


 == Related tickets ==
 The other failures observed on this build of Solaris 10 are #8397, #8398,
 #8399 and #8400

--

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8401#comment:1>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to