#8411: Branching rule fix and doc revision
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: bump | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.3.4
Component: combinatorics | Keywords:
Author: Daniel Bump | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
This corrects a minor problem with branching rules in weyl_characters.py.
Previously branching rules SO(m+n)->SO(m)xSO(n) were implemented using
rule="extended", and similarly for symplectic groups. However there is one
case where this does not meet the definition of the extended rule, namely
SO(2n+2m+2)->SO(2n+1)xSO(2m+1). Indeed, the extended rule checks
to see if the ranks are equal, which they are not in this case.
I thought the cleanest fix was to implement a new rule called
"orthogonal_sum"
for such cases.
I also took the chance to revise the documentation since what was said
before about rule="symmetric" was misleading.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8411>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
