#8283: A better Carmichael lambda function
---------------------------------------------+------------------------------
Reporter: wdj | Owner: mvngu
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-4.3.4
Component: cryptography | Keywords:
Author: Yann Laigle-Chapuy | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: David Joyner, Minh Van Nguyen | Merged:
Work_issues: |
---------------------------------------------+------------------------------
Comment(by mvngu):
Replying to [comment:4 wdj]:
> I read this over - looks good. I also installed it on top of the
previous patch - passed sage -t devel/sage/sage/crypto/util.py. Is that
enough, or it sage -testall necessary?
Running all doctests in the cryptography module subdirectory would be
nice. Something like:
{{{
./sage -t -long devel/sage-main/sage/crypto/
}}}
The module `sage/crypto/util.py` is at least used by the Blum-Goldwasser
class under `sage/crypto/public_key/`. So naturally one would like to know
how the above two patches would affect any other modules under the
cryptography subdirectory.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8283#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
