#8344: Factor constant polynomials over QQbar
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  boothby           |       Owner:  AlexGhitza
       Type:  defect            |      Status:  needs_info
   Priority:  critical          |   Milestone:  sage-4.3.4
  Component:  basic arithmetic  |    Keywords:            
     Author:                    |    Upstream:  N/A       
   Reviewer:                    |      Merged:            
Work_issues:                    |  
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------

Comment(by dimpase):

 Replying to [comment:8 cremona]:
 > Good point, Paul;  I had forgotten that no-one had done this yet, which
 is silly since it only takes one line:
 > {{{
 > sage: x = polygen(QQbar)
 > sage: f = 3*x^2-2
 > sage: Factorization([(x-r,e) for r,e in
 f.roots()],unit=f.leading_coefficient())
 > (3) * (x - 0.8164965809277260?) * (x + 0.8164965809277260?)
 > }}}
 > But doing this for QQbar would also mean doing it for AAbar, which is a
 little more complicated, which is probably why no-one has done it yet.
 > {{{
 > sage: f = x^4-2
 > sage: x = polygen(AA)
 > sage: f = x^4-2
 > sage: fr = f.roots(QQbar)
 > sage: f1 = Factorization([(x-r,e) for r,e in f.roots() if
 f.imag().is_zero()],unit=f.leading_coefficient())
 > sage: f2 = Factorization([(x^2-(r+r.conjugate()).real()*x+r.norm(),e)
 for r,e in fr if f.image()>0])
 > sage: f1*f2
 > (x - 1.189207115002722?) * (x + 1.189207115002722?) * (x^2 +
 1.414213562373095?)
 > }}}
 >
 > It is very tempting to add this as a second patch to the ticket.  Can
 you see anything wrong in my worked examples here?


 Shouldn't these roots be exact? (i.e. they should come with intervals
 isolating them, otherwise one can potentially get
 wrong results, mixing numerical noise with true multiplicities --- or is
 it built-in f.roots() already?)

 (same applies to QQbar---although I do not know anything
 about isolating complex roots, excuse my ignorance...)


 >

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8344#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to