#1221: Consider using Mathematica syntax for integration
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  certik       |       Owner:  mhansen   
       Type:  enhancement  |      Status:  new       
   Priority:  major        |   Milestone:  sage-4.4.1
  Component:  calculus     |    Keywords:            
     Author:               |    Upstream:  N/A       
   Reviewer:               |      Merged:            
Work_issues:               |  
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Changes (by burcin):

 * cc: jason (added)
  * upstream:  => N/A


Comment:

 I suggest we close this ticket since we now support the suggested syntax:

 {{{
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 | Sage Version 4.4.1.alpha2-patched, Release Date: 2010-04-29        |
 | Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.        |
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 **********************************************************************
 *                                                                    *
 * Warning: this is a prerelease version, and it may be unstable.     *
 *                                                                    *
 **********************************************************************
 sage: integrate(x**3, (x, -1, 1))
 0
 sage: integrate(sin(x), (x, 0, pi/2))
 1
 sage: integrate(cos(x), (x, -pi/2, pi/2))
 2
 }}}

 The docstring for `sage.misc.functional.integrate()` and
 `sage.symbolic.integration.integral.integral()` contains plenty of
 doctests to test the tuple syntax.

 Further discussion on
  * implementing multiple integrals with `integrate(cos(x*y), (x, -pi/2,
 pi/2), (y, 0, pi))` and
  * replacing the examples in the docstrings with the tuple syntax and
 deprecating the old one
 can be continued in #2787.

 Comments?

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1221#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to