#8880: CPLEX can now be silenced
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner: jason, jkantor
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.4.1
Component: numerical | Keywords:
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Comment(by jason):
(I guess my comment is the same here as it is on #8364. I still think
it's a better design, but I haven't used these options in practice, so if
you think that it is way too annoying, then say so.
My concerns are:
1. the options are not related to the actual function, so logically they
should be separated out from the function options
1. Anytime we implement a new option for the function (say we make a
graph-theoretic algorithm to do the same thing), we have to check all
solvers to see if we are accidentally overriding a keyword option for the
solver.
You could also make the options part of the solver keyword, like this:
edge_cut(solver=("CPLEX", dict(option1=True, option2=False)))
or
edge_cut(solver=dict(option1=True, option2=False)) # pick the default
solver, pass in these options.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8880#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
