#8862: failing resolution of a nonlinear system by solve
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  casamayou  |       Owner:  burcin    
       Type:  defect     |      Status:  new       
   Priority:  major      |   Milestone:  sage-4.4.1
  Component:  calculus   |    Keywords:  solve     
     Author:             |    Upstream:  N/A       
   Reviewer:             |      Merged:            
Work_issues:             |  
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------

Comment(by zimmerma):

 the issue here is not only that Sage returns undefined points (which
 indeed duplicates #2617) but
 that it fails to find the following (trivial) solutions, which is a
 defect:
 {{{
 sage: sys=[diff(f(x,y), x), diff(f(x,y), y)]
 sage: map(lambda s: s.subs(x=0,y=1),sys)
 [0, 0]
 sage: map(lambda s: s.subs(x=0,y=-1),sys)
 [0, 0]
 sage: map(lambda s: s.subs(x=1/e,y=0),sys)
 [0, 0]
 sage: map(lambda s: s.subs(x=-1/e,y=0),sys)
 [0, 0]
 }}}
 For example Maple finds:
 {{{
 > f := (x,y) -> (x^2 + y^2)^x:
 > solve({diff(f(x,y), x), diff(f(x,y), y)}, {x, y}, Explicit=true);
                                           exp(1)               exp(1)
   {x = 0, y = 1}, {x = 0, y = -1}, {x = - ------, y = 0}, {x = ------, y =
 0}
                                           exp(2)               exp(2)
 }}}
 When some solutions are lost, at least a warning should be issued.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8862#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to