#8915: improve documentation on combinat.dyck_words
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  zabrocki         |       Owner:  zabrocki    
       Type:  defect           |      Status:  needs_review
   Priority:  trivial          |   Milestone:  sage-4.4.2  
  Component:  documentation    |    Keywords:  dyck_words  
     Author:  Mike Zabrocki    |    Upstream:  N/A         
   Reviewer:  Minh Van Nguyen  |      Merged:              
Work_issues:                   |  
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Changes (by mvngu):

  * reviewer:  => Minh Van Nguyen


Old description:

> documentation in several functions are missing description
> {{{
>     def associated_parenthesis(self, pos):
>         """
>         EXAMPLES::
>
>             sage: DyckWord([1, 0]).associated_parenthesis(0)
>             1
> }}}
>
> Working on patch

New description:

 documentation in several functions are missing description
 {{{
     def associated_parenthesis(self, pos):
         """
         EXAMPLES::

             sage: DyckWord([1, 0]).associated_parenthesis(0)
             1
 }}}

 Apply patches in this order:

  1.
 [http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/8915/trac8915.2.patch
 trac8915.2.patch]
  1.
 
[http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/8915/trac_8915-reviewer.patch
 trac_8915-reviewer.patch]

--

Comment:

 The patch
 [http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/8915/trac8915.2.patch
 trac8915.2.patch] is the same as
 [http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/8915/trac8915.patch
 trac8915.patch], but with the ticket number and a commit message. Changes
 proposed by the reviewer patch:

  * Explain the input wherever possible.
  * Don't go over 79 characters per line wherever possible. This is in
 accordance with the style guide [http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/
 PEP 008].
  * Cross reference functions wherever possible.
  * Some typo fixes.

 So only my patch needs review by anyone but me. If my reviewer patch is
 OK, then the whole ticket is good to go.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8915#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to