#8958: Extend/clarify/normalize the conventions for Python/Cython docstrings
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: leif | Owner: mvngu
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: documentation | Keywords: docstring, documentation string,
convention, style
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment(by leif):
Replying to [comment:2 jason]:
> We also have the sphinx-recommended
> {{{
> :param: ...
> }}}
I know... which is more formal but less readable in the plain text, i.e.
if you type
{{{
sage: foo?
}}}
or
{{{
sage: foo??
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8958#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
