#7512: fast_callable should respect the variable order in callable symbolic
expressions (treating them like lambda functions rather than like
expressions)
-------------------------------------------------------+--------------------
   Reporter:  jason                                    |       Owner:  was      
   
       Type:  defect                                   |      Status:  
needs_review
   Priority:  major                                    |   Milestone:  
sage-4.4.3  
  Component:  graphics                                 |    Keywords:           
   
     Author:  Robert Bradshaw, Tim Dumol, Jason Grout  |    Upstream:  N/A      
   
   Reviewer:  Ross Kyprianou                           |      Merged:           
   
Work_issues:                                           |  
-------------------------------------------------------+--------------------

Comment(by jason):

 Replying to [comment:10 kcrisman]:



 > 2. Why did you decide again that 1 and 3 should be different from 2 and
 4?  I'm just curious, since this seems VERY counter-intuitive to me, since
 we go to the trouble of having g(x=1,y=2)==g(y=2,x=1) for callable guys
 and not allowing other variable names in them (this came up in the PREP
 workshop from a user question).




 We do allow other variable names in callable expressions:

 {{{
 sage: f(x,y)=a*x+y
 sage: f(1,2)
 a + 2
 sage: f(a=2)
 2*x + y
 }}}


 I'm also looking at your other points...

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7512#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to