#9062: Add support for toric lattices
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
   Reporter:  novoselt            |       Owner:  mhampton    
       Type:  enhancement         |      Status:  needs_review
   Priority:  major               |   Milestone:  sage-4.4.3  
  Component:  geometry            |    Keywords:              
     Author:  Andrey Novoseltsev  |    Upstream:  N/A         
   Reviewer:                      |      Merged:              
Work_issues:                      |  
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Changes (by novoselt):

  * status:  needs_work => needs_review


Old description:

> Toric lattices are ZZ^n^'s with distinction of their roles (in the
> simplest case - standard dual lattices M and N).
>
> Once this patch is finished, it will be the first part of the toric
> varieties framework #8986-#8989, but so far I made it actually on top of
> those modules. Creation of cones and fans seems to work as expected. More
> work is needed on matrix multiplication. Working on it!

New description:

 Toric lattices are ZZ^n^'s with distinction of their roles (in the
 simplest case - standard dual lattices M and N).

 This patch is a part of the following series adding support for
 cones/fans and toric varieties to Sage:

 Prerequisites:

 #8675  - Remove `AmbientSpace._constructor` and fix consequences

 #8682  - Improve `AlgebraicScheme_subscheme.__init__` and
 `AmbientSpace._validate`

 #8694  - Improve schemes printing and !LaTeXing

 #8934  - Trivial bug in computing faces of non-full-dimensional lattice
 polytopes

 #8936  - Expose facet inequalities for lattice polytopes

 #8941  - `_latex_` and `origin` for lattice polytopes

 Main  patches adding new modules:

 #9062  - Add support for toric lattices

 #8986  - Add support for convex rational polyhedral cones

 #8987  - Add support for rational polyhedral fans

 #8988  - Add support for toric varieties

 #8989  - Add support for Fano toric varieties

--

Comment:

 It will probably work without other "prerequisites," but I tested it with
 them applied since all got positive review already and hopefully will be
 merged soon...

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9062#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to