#9026: Issues preventing 64-bit builds on various flavors of Solaris.
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: drkirkby | Owner: drkirkby
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.4.3
Component: solaris | Keywords:
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Description changed by drkirkby:
Old description:
> The following is list of the issues that are currently preventing Sage
> build on either
>
> * !OpenSolaris (aka Solaris 11) on Intel/AMD x64. (e.g. 'disk')
> * Solaris 10 on Intel/AMD (e.g. 'fulva')
> * Solaris 10 on SPARC (e.g. 't2')
>
> The list can be added as new problems are found, making what William
> calls a 'metaticket'
>
> Please put
> * "yes" if the trac ticket is known, or one might reasonably expect it
> to cause a problem on a particular platform.
> * "no" if one knows the problem does not exist on that platform, or one
> reasonably expect it will not be an issue.
> * "unknown" if one can not determine if it will be an issue.
>
> Although !OpenSolaris can run on the SPARC platform, very few people run
> it, so there is little to be gained by tracking issues on that platform.
> (David Kirkby does not have !OpenSolaris installed on any of his SPARC
> systems)
>
> ||'''Trac'''||'''Title'''||'''S10 SPARC'''||'''S10 x64'''||
> '''!OpenSolaris x64'''||'''Notes'''||
> ||#7864||libfplll tries to link 64-bit objects to 32-bit
> libstdc++.so||unknown||unknown||yes||||
> ||#7982||sage_fortran is not working properly on Open Solaris x64 in 64
> bit mode.||yes||yes||yes||'''needs review'''||
> ||#8089||ecl 9.10.2-20091105cvs.p1 faiils to build on Open Solaris
> x64||unknown||unknown||yes||Solved by #8951, which is a later version of
> ECL||
> ||#9008||Update zlib to latest upstream, and clean up spkg-
> install||yes||unknown||yes||'''needs review'''||
> ||#9009||Mercurial is not building 64-bit with !OpenSolaris with
> SAGE64=yes.||yes||yes||yes||Now has positive review||
> ||#9022||python fails to build _socket on !OpenSolaris x64, so ipython
> fails to build.||unknown||unknown||yes||fixed by #9041 which '''needs
> review'''||
> ||#9023||ghmm is buiding 32-bit on !OpenSolaris x64 even when SAGE64 is
> set to "yes"||yes||yes||yes||||
> ||#9024||tachyon is buiding 32-bit on !OpenSolaris x64 even when SAGE64
> is set to "yes"||yes||yes||yes||'''needs review'''||
> ||#9025||PALP is building 32-bit on !OpenSolaris - probably other
> platforms too.||yes||yes||yes||I suspect this building 64-bit on OS X
> too, as there is nothing in the Makefile to force the -m64 flag on any
> platform at all. '''needs review too'''||
> ||#9029||sympow is buiding 32-bit on !OpenSolaris x64 even when SAGE64 is
> set to "yes"||yes||yes||yes||'''needs review'''||
> ||#9030||rubiks is building part 32-bit and part 64-bit on !OpenSolaris
> x64.||yes||yes||yes||'''needs review'''||
> ||#9033||Singular does not try to build 64-bit on !OpenSolaris
> x64||yes||yes||yes||Singular does not even build fully as 32-bit, though
> it installs a few 32-bit object files in $SAGE_LOCAL/bin||
> ||#9034||flintqs builds as 32-bit despite SAGE64=yes on !OpenSolaris
> x64||yes||yes||yes||'''needs review'''||
> ||#9037||pynac fails to build on 64-bit !OpenSolaris
> x64.||yes||yes||yes||Pynac 0.2 now in Sage. That must be fixed - see
> #8903 too||
> ||#9041||python fails to build _socket on !OpenSolaris x64, so pygments
> fails to build.||unknown||unknown||yes||'''needs review'''||
> ||#9042||Cython fails to build on !OpenSolaris
> x64||unknown||unknown||yes||Positive review||
> ||#9043||lcalc failing to build on !OpenSolaris
> x64.||yes||yes||yes||'''needs review'''||
> ||#9040||fatal relocation error installing R on
> !OpenSolaris||unknown||unknown||yes||
> ||#9097||c_lib in Sage library fails to build on !OpenSolaris
> x64||unknown||unknown||yes||Could be tricky - SCons problem, and I
> dislike SCons||
> ||#9098||gap buillds 32-bit on !OpenSolaris when
> SAGE64=yes||yes||yes||yes||The -m64 option is not added on any platform||
> ||#9099||Maxima fails to build on !OpenSolaris x64, though ECL
> does.||unknown||unknown||yes||||
> ||#9100||scipy is probably building part 32-bit on !OpenSolaris x64 when
> SAGE64=yes||unknown||unknown||yes||This is odd - see trac ticket||
New description:
The following is list of the issues that are currently preventing Sage
build on either
* !OpenSolaris (aka Solaris 11) on Intel/AMD x64. (e.g. 'disk')
* Solaris 10 on Intel/AMD (e.g. 'fulva')
* Solaris 10 on SPARC (e.g. 't2')
The list can be added as new problems are found, making what William calls
a 'metaticket'
Please put
* "yes" if the trac ticket is known, or one might reasonably expect it to
cause a problem on a particular platform.
* "no" if one knows the problem does not exist on that platform, or one
reasonably expect it will not be an issue.
* "unknown" if one can not determine if it will be an issue.
Although !OpenSolaris can run on the SPARC platform, very few people run
it, so there is little to be gained by tracking issues on that platform.
(David Kirkby does not have !OpenSolaris installed on any of his SPARC
systems)
||'''Trac'''||'''Title'''||'''S10 SPARC'''||'''S10 x64'''||
'''!OpenSolaris x64'''||'''Notes'''||
||#7864||libfplll tries to link 64-bit objects to 32-bit
libstdc++.so||unknown||unknown||yes||||
||#7982||sage_fortran is not working properly on Open Solaris x64 in 64
bit mode.||yes||yes||yes||'''needs review'''||
||#8089||ecl 9.10.2-20091105cvs.p1 faiils to build on Open Solaris
x64||unknown||unknown||yes||Solved by #8951, which is a later version of
ECL||
||#9008||Update zlib to latest upstream, and clean up spkg-
install||yes||unknown||yes||'''needs review'''||
||#9009||Mercurial is not building 64-bit with !OpenSolaris with
SAGE64=yes.||yes||yes||yes||Now has positive review||
||#9022||python fails to build _socket on !OpenSolaris x64, so ipython
fails to build.||unknown||unknown||yes||fixed by #9041 which '''needs
review'''||
||#9023||ghmm is buiding 32-bit on !OpenSolaris x64 even when SAGE64 is
set to "yes"||yes||yes||yes||||
||#9024||tachyon is buiding 32-bit on !OpenSolaris x64 even when SAGE64 is
set to "yes"||yes||yes||yes||'''needs review'''||
||#9025||PALP is building 32-bit on !OpenSolaris - probably other
platforms too.||yes||yes||yes||I suspect this building 64-bit on OS X too,
as there is nothing in the Makefile to force the -m64 flag on any platform
at all. '''needs review too'''||
||#9029||sympow is buiding 32-bit on !OpenSolaris x64 even when SAGE64 is
set to "yes"||yes||yes||yes||'''needs review'''||
||#9030||rubiks is building part 32-bit and part 64-bit on !OpenSolaris
x64.||yes||yes||yes||'''needs review'''||
||#9033||Singular does not try to build 64-bit on !OpenSolaris
x64||yes||yes||yes||Singular does not even build fully as 32-bit, though
it installs a few 32-bit object files in $SAGE_LOCAL/bin||
||#9034||flintqs builds as 32-bit despite SAGE64=yes on !OpenSolaris
x64||yes||yes||yes||'''needs review'''||
||#9037||pynac fails to build on 64-bit !OpenSolaris
x64.||yes||yes||yes||Pynac 0.2 now in Sage. That must be fixed - see #8903
too||
||#9041||python fails to build _socket on !OpenSolaris x64, so pygments
fails to build.||unknown||unknown||yes||'''needs review'''||
||#9042||Cython fails to build on !OpenSolaris
x64||unknown||unknown||yes||Positive review||
||#9043||lcalc failing to build on !OpenSolaris
x64.||yes||yes||yes||'''needs review'''||
||#9040||fatal relocation error installing R on
!OpenSolaris||unknown||unknown||yes||
||#9097||c_lib in Sage library fails to build on !OpenSolaris
x64||unknown||unknown||yes||Could be tricky - SCons problem, and I dislike
SCons||
||#9098||gap buillds 32-bit on !OpenSolaris when
SAGE64=yes||yes||yes||yes||The -m64 option is not added on any platform||
||#9099||Maxima fails to build on !OpenSolaris x64, though ECL
does.||unknown||unknown||yes||||
||#9100||scipy is probably building part 32-bit on !OpenSolaris x64 when
SAGE64=yes||unknown||unknown||yes||This is odd - see trac ticket||
||#9101||linbox reports "ERROR: BLAS not found!" on Solaris 10 SPARC
(64-bit build).||yes||unknown||no||I believe spkg/standard/deps is missing
the fact linbox depends on BLAS||
--
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9026#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
