#8704: Improve the _repr_ of IntegerRange
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: hivert | Owner: hivert
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.4.3
Component: combinatorics | Keywords: integer range
Author: Florent Hivert | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Comment(by hivert):
I fixed the following issues raised by Nicolas on sage-combinat-devel
{{{
> >> The output of IntegerRange is much nicer now. I was about to put a
> >> positive review, when I had a last doubt about the consistency
between:
> >>
> >> sage: I = IntegerRange(2,100,5); I
> >> {2, 7 .. 97}
> >> sage: I = IntegerRange(54,Infinity,3); I
> >> {54, 57, ..}
> >>
> >> Should there be a comma in both cases, in none, or is it good as is?
> >
> > I would say {2, 7 .. 97} should be replaced by {2, 7, .., 97} for
> > consistency.
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8704#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
