#7987: Most extensions don't need to be listed in module_list
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: robertwb | Owner: GeorgSWeber
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.4.3
Component: build | Keywords:
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Changes (by leif):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
Comment:
Not surprising (see ticket description), the patches need to be rebased.
The merged Cygwin patch involved many changes to {{{module_list.py}}},
too.
Btw, IMHO {{{libcsage}}} and {{{libstdcxx}}} should '''not''' be "linked"
unconditionally (especially regardless of the module's {{{language}}}) to
each and every module.
(I recently started sorting out which modules really directly use
{{{libcsage}}}, and did add {{{"stdcxx"}}} to {{{libraries}}} only if
{{{language=="c++"}}}. Currently suspended work in progress...)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7987#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
