#6922: Matrix term ordering
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  klee              |       Owner:  Somebody    
       Type:  enhancement       |      Status:  needs_review
   Priority:  minor             |   Milestone:  sage-4.4.4  
  Component:  basic arithmetic  |    Keywords:  term order  
     Author:  Kwankyu Lee       |    Upstream:  N/A         
   Reviewer:                    |      Merged:              
Work_issues:                    |  
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------

Comment(by klee):

 Replying to [comment:13 malb]:

 > * `NotImplementedError, "Singular engine in Sage cannot handle matrix
 ordering yet."` should be replaced by `NotImplementedError("Matrix term
 orderings are not supported by the libSingular interface yet."` or
 something along those lines. I propose this change to make it clearer that
 Singular can indeed deal with Matrix term orderings and that it is us who
 cannot.

 I agree.

 > * `TypeError: Cannot use a matrix term order as a block.` shouldn't that
 be a `NotImplementedError`?

 I know Singular allow matrix term orderings in block order. But this
 feature is not one of the aims of the current patch. That could be
 included in a future patch that use Singular version.

 > * I thought the agreement was not to allow 'matrix(0,1,2,3)' but to use
 Singular's convention instead? It seems you are allowing at and using it
 internally.

 I did not agree then. :-) Anyway, I will change it to 'm(...)'

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6922#comment:15>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to