#9222: improve doctest coverage of databases/conway.py
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: AlexGhitza | Owner: tbd
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-4.4.4
Component: doctest | Keywords: conway polynomial database
Author: Alex Ghitza | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Changes (by newvalueoldvalue):
* status: new => needs_review
* author: => Alex Ghitza
Comment:
After the patch:
{{{
ERROR: Please add a `TestSuite(s).run()` doctest.
SCORE conway.py: 85% (6 of 7)
Missing documentation:
* _init(self):
}}}
I'm not convinced a {{{TestSuite}}} test makes sense here (and I have
tried to put one in and got a pickling-related error). Also, I'm not sure
what {{{_init(self)}}} is meant to be doing, so I'm leaving it alone for
now.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9222#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
