#9244: Number field class group improvements
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: davidloeffler | Owner: davidloeffler
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.4.5
Component: number fields | Keywords:
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
I was working on doctesting {{{sage/rings/number_field/class_group.py}}},
and I was unable to resist the temptation to rewrite it. (There were all
sorts of failures and inconsistencies caused by the fact that
{{{ClassGroup}}} derived from {{{AbelianGroup}}}, but
{{{FractionalIdealClass}}} didn't derive from {{{AbelianGroupElement}}}.)
I have a patch for this, depending on #9242, which I will upload as soon
as someone explains how to squash the {{{_test_category()}}} error.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9244>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
