#9325: Bugs concerning coding comments and docstrings in sage-preparse
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
   Reporter:  dpoetzsch               |       Owner:  ncalexan          
       Type:  defect                  |      Status:  new               
   Priority:  major                   |   Milestone:                    
  Component:  sage-mode               |    Keywords:  preparse docstring
     Author:  David Poetzsch-Heffter  |    Upstream:  N/A               
   Reviewer:                          |      Merged:                    
Work_issues:                          |  
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
 I found (and fixed) a few Bugs in the file local/bin/sage-preparse.

 These are the things I fixed:

 * The module docstrings disappeared when preparsing because the
 preparse_file function inserted those numeric_literals definitions before
 the docstrings.

 * Now also unicode-docstrings (e.g. u"""foo""") are recognized as
 docstrings. Also raw docstrings may now use an upper case R as string
 modifier (R"""foo""" would work now) which is allowed in Python.

 * Now all coding-comments as specified by Python are found and excluded
 from preparsing.

 * I did not fix a bug that occurs when a statement is on the same line
 where the docstring ends (e.g. """foo"""; print 2^5). It will not be
 preparsed! I added a TODO-comment on the according line.

 greetings,
 David Poetzsch-Heffter

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9325>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to