#9355: 100% coverage for quadratic_forms
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: annahaensch | Owner: mvngu
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.5
Component: documentation | Keywords:
Author: Anna Haensch | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: David Loeffler | Merged:
Work_issues: loads/dumps doctests |
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Changes (by davidloeffler):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
* reviewer: => David Loeffler
* work_issues: => loads/dumps doctests
Comment:
I tried this, and it is fine as far as it goes but {{{sage -coverage}}}
still grumbles about the lack of a {{{TestSuite.run()}}} doctest in
genera/genus.py. In fact the two classes in that file don't derive from
SageObject (although they probably should), so the TestSuite machinery
doesn't work on them; but it would be good to have loads/dumps doctests
for these classes. With those added I would be happy for this to go in.
(A much bigger step forward would be adding the quadratic forms code to
the reference manual, but that's a separate issue.)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9355#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
